Who Recommended Your Agent — and Why?

What home sellers should understand about comparison websites, agent referrals and commercial introductions

When someone recommends a real estate agent, most sellers naturally assume the recommendation is based on that agent being the best person for their property.

Sometimes it is.

But there may also be a commercial relationship behind the introduction, including a referral fee if the agent is appointed.

There is nothing inherently wrong with that. Many excellent agents are introduced through referrals, and the existence of a referral fee does not automatically make a recommendation unsuitable.

What matters is whether the arrangement is transparent, how the agent was selected and what work was undertaken before the recommendation was made.

Not all referral services provide the same level of research, advice or ongoing involvement. Sellers should understand whether they are receiving a simple introduction or a genuine agent-selection service.

Online agent-comparison and agent-finder websites

Online agent-comparison and agent-finder websites can be appealing because they promise to make choosing an agent easier.

A homeowner enters their contact and property details which are then sent to agents who work in that area. Depending on the provider and its terms, the platform typically receives a referral or success fee if the homeowner appoints one of the agents introduced through the service.

In some cases, that referral arrangement may remain active for a considerable period, potentially up to 24 months.

A seller may therefore make an initial enquiry, take no further action and then return to the agent many months later believing they are making a fresh or independent approach. However, depending on the provider’s terms, the original referral arrangement may still apply behind the scenes.

It’s also important to understand what is actually being compared.

The agents displayed may come from a participating network, which means the platform may not be assessing every suitable agent working in that market. Depending on the provider, commercial or sponsored arrangements may also play a role in which agents are displayed or how prominently they appear.

That doesn’t necessarily mean the agents presented are poor choices. However, sellers should understand how the shortlist was created and whether it represents a broad assessment of the market.

Download our Free Downsizer's Home-Selling Guide for 2026

When one agent recommends another

Another common situation arises when a seller asks an agent they already know to recommend someone in another suburb or region.

The referring agent may know an excellent local agent and make a genuinely valuable introduction. There may also be a commercial arrangement involved, with the referring agent receiving a share of the eventual selling commission.

The recommendation may be based on the agents belonging to the same franchise or professional network, having an existing relationship, referring business to one another or simply knowing and trusting each other professionally.

There is nothing necessarily wrong with that.

However, a professional introduction is not the same as a detailed agent-selection process.

The referring agent may not have reviewed the agent’s recent comparable sales, compared them with other strong agents in the area, assessed the quality of their current marketing or interviewed them specifically about the seller’s property and proposed strategy.

The recommended agent may still be an excellent choice. But sellers should ask whether that agent was selected because they were genuinely assessed as the strongest fit for the property, or because they were the person already known to the referring agent.

Those two things can overlap, but they should not automatically be treated as the same.

Transparency matters — including in vendor advocacy

I believe the same questions should apply to any referral-based service, including my own.

Sydney Vendor Advocates also operates under a referral-based commercial model. When a client appoints an agent through our service, we receive a share of the agent’s commission at settlement, which is clearly disclosed. We also negotiate the agent’s commission and terms on the seller’s behalf before appointment.

So, in my view, the issue is not simply whether a referral fee exists.

The more important questions are whether the arrangement is clearly disclosed, how the agent was selected, whether several suitable agents were genuinely researched and compared, what evidence supports the recommendation, and what service and accountability the seller receives beyond the initial introduction.

In my own work, I don’t simply provide a seller with an agent’s name and then step away.

I assess the property and the seller’s individual circumstances, research the relevant local market, identify and compare suitable agents, and interview those shortlisted specifically about the property. I assess their recent comparable results, proposed strategy, marketing recommendations, communication and reporting standards, and negotiation ability.

I then negotiate the appointed agent’s commission and terms on the seller’s behalf and remain involved throughout the sale campaign.

The introduction is only one small part of the service.      

How to Choose the Right Real Estate Agent (My Shortlisting Process Explained)

The questions every seller should ask

Regardless of how an agent recommendation comes about, sellers should feel comfortable asking:

💬 Is there a referral fee or another commercial arrangement involved?
💬 How was this particular agent selected?
💬 Were other suitable agents researched and compared?
💬 What evidence shows this agent is well suited to my property?
💬 Does the person recommending the agent know their recent results and current performance?
💬 Will anyone negotiate the agent’s commission and terms on my behalf?
💬 What service is being provided beyond the initial introduction?
💬 What involvement or responsibility will the referrer retain after the introduction?

A recommendation from someone you trust can be extremely valuable. So can an online comparison service, professional adviser or vendor advocate.

But sellers should understand the basis on which the recommendation is being made.

It is not necessarily the referral fee that is the problem

For me, the existence of a referral fee is not automatically the issue. What matters is transparency, the depth of the selection process, whether the recommended agent is genuinely suited to the property, and what service and accountability the seller receives in return.

Choosing the right agent can have a significant impact on the final result of a property sale. A good recommendation should be able to withstand scrutiny, and sellers should understand why that particular agent has been recommended and what evidence supports the decision.

Because ultimately, the most important question is not simply:

“Who recommended this agent?”

It is:

“Why is this the right agent for my property?”

If you’re planning to sell and would like help independently researching, comparing and interviewing suitable agents for your property, feel free to book a call at a time that suits you or call me directly on 0411 522 233.

Disclaimer: Referral arrangements, fee structures and timeframes vary between providers and may change over time. Sellers should review the relevant provider’s current disclosures and terms before providing their details or appointing an agent. 

 

Book A Free 30 minute Phone Consultation With
Our Vendor Advocates!

A smooth, stress-free experience!

“Initially not a big fan of agents. We engaged Kathryn Fantov having never dealt with an Agent / Vendor before. This lady is remarkable and hard working. Her staff were similarly professional. Nothing seemed too much and the confidence she instilled was gratifying.

It was a difficult time selling the family home and SVA made it seem less. They are still helping even after a highly successful campaign.Thank you sincerely Kathryn and your staff.”

Michael

 

Share our article:​